Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.
Beide Seiten der vorigen Revision Vorhergehende Überarbeitung Nächste Überarbeitung | Vorhergehende Überarbeitung Nächste Überarbeitung Beide Seiten der Revision | ||
angelica_archangelica_l [2017/11/08 12:49] andreas |
angelica_archangelica_l [2019/02/19 17:52] andreas |
||
---|---|---|---|
Zeile 16: | Zeile 16: | ||
[Characterization of the Macrolide Fraction of Angelica Root Oil and Enantiomeric Composition of 12-Methyl-13-tridecanolide. Schultz, K., Kraft, P., Journal of Essential Oil Research, Vol.9(5), 1997, 509-514] | [Characterization of the Macrolide Fraction of Angelica Root Oil and Enantiomeric Composition of 12-Methyl-13-tridecanolide. Schultz, K., Kraft, P., Journal of Essential Oil Research, Vol.9(5), 1997, 509-514] | ||
- | |{{: | + | |{{: |
"Roots and seeds of Angelica archangelica L. were collected from different localities in western, eastern and northern Finnish Lapland. Two root samples and 33 seed samples were extracted with n-hexane and analysed by GC-MS using a chiral β-cyclodextrin phase. Major compounds in the root oils were (−)-α-pinene (19-42%) and (+)-sabinene (21-28%). One of the oils contained 22% (+)-3-carene but the other one had none at all. The seed oils were dominated by (−)-β-phellandrene (>60%). Other major compounds were (+)-sabinene, | "Roots and seeds of Angelica archangelica L. were collected from different localities in western, eastern and northern Finnish Lapland. Two root samples and 33 seed samples were extracted with n-hexane and analysed by GC-MS using a chiral β-cyclodextrin phase. Major compounds in the root oils were (−)-α-pinene (19-42%) and (+)-sabinene (21-28%). One of the oils contained 22% (+)-3-carene but the other one had none at all. The seed oils were dominated by (−)-β-phellandrene (>60%). Other major compounds were (+)-sabinene, | ||
Zeile 33: | Zeile 33: | ||
"The roots of Angelica archangelica L. were collected in three habitats (12 samples) in 1995-2002. The oils were analyzed by GC and GC/MS. The dominant component was α-pinene (15.7-20.8%) for two localities. Other three main constituents were δ-3-carene (15.4-16.9%), | "The roots of Angelica archangelica L. were collected in three habitats (12 samples) in 1995-2002. The oils were analyzed by GC and GC/MS. The dominant component was α-pinene (15.7-20.8%) for two localities. Other three main constituents were δ-3-carene (15.4-16.9%), | ||
[The chemical composition of the essential oil of Angelica archangelica L. roots growing wild in Lithuania. Nivinskienė, | [The chemical composition of the essential oil of Angelica archangelica L. roots growing wild in Lithuania. Nivinskienė, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Whereas 12-methyl-13-tridecanolide smells musky, the parent 14-membered macrolide tridecano-13-lactone (tridecanolide) does not. Moreover, also the enantiomers (which occure together in Angelica root oil with and R/S ratio of 72:28) " | ||
+ | [Kraft, Philip. Perspectives in flavor and fragrance research. John Wiley & Sons, 2005, 132-133] | ||
"The largest part of the essential oil from A. archangelica L. roots was composed of monoterpene hydrocarbons. α-pinene was found as a dominant constituent in more than half of the investigated plant oils obtained from Finland, Norway, France, and Brazil. Other dominant components such as β-phellandrene, | "The largest part of the essential oil from A. archangelica L. roots was composed of monoterpene hydrocarbons. α-pinene was found as a dominant constituent in more than half of the investigated plant oils obtained from Finland, Norway, France, and Brazil. Other dominant components such as β-phellandrene, |