Tinkturenpresse

Benutzer-Werkzeuge

Webseiten-Werkzeuge

Zuletzt angesehen:
angelica_archangelica_l

Unterschiede

Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.

Link zu dieser Vergleichsansicht

Beide Seiten der vorigen Revision Vorhergehende Überarbeitung
Nächste Überarbeitung 		Vorhergehende Überarbeitung
Nächste Überarbeitung Beide Seiten der Revision
angelica_archangelica_l [2017/11/08 10:10]
andreas 		angelica_archangelica_l [2018/12/11 16:47]
andreas
Zeile 28: Zeile 28:
 "Essential oils obtained from Angelica archangelica L. roots immediately and after storage about 2.5 months after crushing were analyzed by GC and GC MS. The dominant component in the oils from roots crushed before analysis was α-pinene (15.7-19.4%), the other major compounds being δ -3-carene (15.4-16.0%) and limonene (8.1-8.8 %) or β-phellandrene (15.4%) and δ-3-carene (14.2%), depending on the growing localities. The dominating constituent of the crushed and stored root oils was 15-pentadecanolide (7.2-14.9%). The other main constituents were coumarine osthol (5.3-8.8%) and macrocyclic lactone 13-tridecanolide (5.4-6.1%). A large part (about 70%) of monoterpene hydrocarbons was evaporated during storage from small particles of roots, while the fraction of macrocyclic lactones (14.3-25.2%) and the amounts of coumarin osthol (5.3-8.8%) increased relatively 2-5 times." \\ "Essential oils obtained from Angelica archangelica L. roots immediately and after storage about 2.5 months after crushing were analyzed by GC and GC MS. The dominant component in the oils from roots crushed before analysis was α-pinene (15.7-19.4%), the other major compounds being δ -3-carene (15.4-16.0%) and limonene (8.1-8.8 %) or β-phellandrene (15.4%) and δ-3-carene (14.2%), depending on the growing localities. The dominating constituent of the crushed and stored root oils was 15-pentadecanolide (7.2-14.9%). The other main constituents were coumarine osthol (5.3-8.8%) and macrocyclic lactone 13-tridecanolide (5.4-6.1%). A large part (about 70%) of monoterpene hydrocarbons was evaporated during storage from small particles of roots, while the fraction of macrocyclic lactones (14.3-25.2%) and the amounts of coumarin osthol (5.3-8.8%) increased relatively 2-5 times." \\
 [Changes in the chemical composition of essential oil of Angelica archangelica L. roots during storage. Nivinskienë, O., Butkienë, R., Mockutë, D., Chemija (Vilnius), 14(1), 2003, 52-56]  [Changes in the chemical composition of essential oil of Angelica archangelica L. roots during storage. Nivinskienë, O., Butkienë, R., Mockutë, D., Chemija (Vilnius), 14(1), 2003, 52-56] 
 +
 +{{:osthol.jpg|}} osthole (7-methoxy-8-(3-methylbut-2-enyl)-2-chromenone)
  
 "The roots of Angelica archangelica L. were collected in three habitats (12 samples) in 1995-2002. The oils were analyzed by GC and GC/MS. The dominant component was α-pinene (15.7-20.8%) for two localities. Other three main constituents were δ-3-carene (15.4-16.9%), limonene (8.0-9.2%), sabinene (5.0-7.5%) for the first locality, and δ-phellandrene (13.5-15.4%), δ-3-carene (13.2-14.2%) and α-phellandrene (8.0-9.1%) for the second locality. The dominant oil components in the third locality were β-phellandrene (13.8-18.5%) together with α-pinene (11.4-15.0%), δ-3-carene (10.8-11.9%), α-cymene (6.8-10.6%) and α-phellandrene (5.9-8.6%). The oils contained 67.3-79.9% monoterpenoids (monoterpene hydrocarbons made up 60.2-72.6%), 9.6-19.4% sesquiterpenoids, 3.9-6.3% macrocyclic lactones and 1.2-5.3% coumarin osthol. Identified compounds (81 from 96) made up 91.4-99.2% of the oils." \\ "The roots of Angelica archangelica L. were collected in three habitats (12 samples) in 1995-2002. The oils were analyzed by GC and GC/MS. The dominant component was α-pinene (15.7-20.8%) for two localities. Other three main constituents were δ-3-carene (15.4-16.9%), limonene (8.0-9.2%), sabinene (5.0-7.5%) for the first locality, and δ-phellandrene (13.5-15.4%), δ-3-carene (13.2-14.2%) and α-phellandrene (8.0-9.1%) for the second locality. The dominant oil components in the third locality were β-phellandrene (13.8-18.5%) together with α-pinene (11.4-15.0%), δ-3-carene (10.8-11.9%), α-cymene (6.8-10.6%) and α-phellandrene (5.9-8.6%). The oils contained 67.3-79.9% monoterpenoids (monoterpene hydrocarbons made up 60.2-72.6%), 9.6-19.4% sesquiterpenoids, 3.9-6.3% macrocyclic lactones and 1.2-5.3% coumarin osthol. Identified compounds (81 from 96) made up 91.4-99.2% of the oils." \\
 [The chemical composition of the essential oil of Angelica archangelica L. roots growing wild in Lithuania. Nivinskienė, O., Butkienė, R., Mockutė, D., Journal of essential oil research, Vol.17(4), 2005, 373-377] [The chemical composition of the essential oil of Angelica archangelica L. roots growing wild in Lithuania. Nivinskienė, O., Butkienė, R., Mockutė, D., Journal of essential oil research, Vol.17(4), 2005, 373-377]
 +
 +Whereas 12-methyl-13-tridecanolide smells musky, the parent 14-membered macrolide tridecano-13-lactone (tridecanolide) does not. Moreover, also the enantiomers (which occure together in Angelica root oil with and R/S ratio of 72:28) "...differ significantly in their odor character: while the (+)-(12R)-isomer posesses a strong clean musk odor with sandalwood-like and fruity aspects, the enantiomer (-)-(12S) emanates an animalic musk odor with camphoraceous aspects." \\
 +[Kraft, Philip. Perspectives in flavor and fragrance research. John Wiley & Sons, 2005, 132-133]
  
 "The largest part of the essential oil from A. archangelica L. roots was composed of monoterpene hydrocarbons. α-pinene was found as a dominant constituent in more than half of the investigated plant oils obtained from Finland, Norway, France, and Brazil. Other dominant components such as β-phellandrene, δ-3-carene, and "The largest part of the essential oil from A. archangelica L. roots was composed of monoterpene hydrocarbons. α-pinene was found as a dominant constituent in more than half of the investigated plant oils obtained from Finland, Norway, France, and Brazil. Other dominant components such as β-phellandrene, δ-3-carene, and
Zeile 36: Zeile 41:
 of the total oil. The importance and usefulness of GC/MS chemical fingerprinting during this study demonstrated that one sample of A. sinensis was misidentified as A.archangelica by the vendor in China. Our GC/MS profile indicated that the A.sinensis oil was rich in phthalides not in monoterpene hydrocarbons and was misidentified and was not A.archangelica as originally indicated" \\ of the total oil. The importance and usefulness of GC/MS chemical fingerprinting during this study demonstrated that one sample of A. sinensis was misidentified as A.archangelica by the vendor in China. Our GC/MS profile indicated that the A.sinensis oil was rich in phthalides not in monoterpene hydrocarbons and was misidentified and was not A.archangelica as originally indicated" \\
 [Bioactivity-guided fractionation and GC/MS fingerprinting of Angelica sinensis and Angelica archangelica root components for antifungal and mosquito deterrent activity. Wedge, D. E., Klun, J. A., Tabanca, N., Demirci, B., Ozek, T., Baser, K. H. C., Zhang, J., Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 57(2), 2009, 464-470] [[http://www.afpmb.org/sites/default/files/pubs/dwfp/publications/FY09/Wedge/Wedge2009.pdf]] [Bioactivity-guided fractionation and GC/MS fingerprinting of Angelica sinensis and Angelica archangelica root components for antifungal and mosquito deterrent activity. Wedge, D. E., Klun, J. A., Tabanca, N., Demirci, B., Ozek, T., Baser, K. H. C., Zhang, J., Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 57(2), 2009, 464-470] [[http://www.afpmb.org/sites/default/files/pubs/dwfp/publications/FY09/Wedge/Wedge2009.pdf]]
 +
 +Osthole may be (partly) responsible for the antispasmodic effect of A.archangelica, as it is also responsible for the relaxant effect on the rat ileum as a component of [[prangos_ferulacea_l._lindl|Prangos ferulacea]]. \\
 +[Antispasmodic effects of Prangos ferulacea acetone extract and its main component osthole on ileum contraction., Sadraei, H., Shokoohinia, Y., Sajjadi, S.E., Mozafari, M., Research in pharmaceutical sciences, Vol.8(2), 2013, 137] \\
 +[[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3764677/]]
  
 {{:angelica_officinalis.jpg?600}} \\ {{:angelica_officinalis.jpg?600}} \\
angelica_archangelica_l.txt · Zuletzt geändert: 2022/06/08 21:01 von andreas

Seiten-Werkzeuge

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki