Unterschiede

Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.

--- rebutia_marsoneri_werderm [2016/04/05 22:33] – andreas
+++ rebutia_marsoneri_werderm [2017/10/28 15:01] (aktuell) – andreas
@@ Zeile 14: / Zeile 14: @@
 [Biosynthesis of the Irregular C12‐Terpenoid Dehydrogeosmin in Flower Heads of Rebutia marsoneri WERD.(Cactaceae)., Feng, Z., Huber, U., Boland, W., Helvetica chimica acta, 76(7), 1993, 2547-2552]
-Dehydrogeosmin (DHG) is the main volatile of R.marsoneri and Gymnocalycium andreae flowers. In all DHG-producing plants studied, floral scents were emitted in a diurnal rhythm. "The emission rate studies of DHG in Rebutia fabrisii showed quantitative variation between individuals, despite the fact that these plants were maintained under identical conditions and the flowers were of the same developmental stage... The similarities of floral scent composition found in plants of different genera, as in some species of Gymnocalycium and Rebutia, give further indications that the odor bouquets of these cacti have no taxonomic value. Similar scent compositions more likely reflect convergent adaptations to the same pollinator groups..." \\
+The headspace of R.marsoneri flowers contained (+)-dehydrogeosmin (33.0%) and (-)-geosmin (0.01%). \\
+[Kaiser, Roman. „Scents from rain forests.“ CHIMIA International Journal for Chemistry 54.6 (2000): 346-363]
+Dehydrogeosmin (DHG) production was studied in six cacti genera: Echinopsis hybrid, Echinopsis
+obrepanda, Gymnocalycium andreae, Gymnocalycium bruchii, Gymnocalycium bodenbenderianum ssp. intertextum,
+Gymnocalycium monvillei, Mammillaria baumii, Mammillaria longimamma, Mammillaria surculosa, Parodia procera,
+Parodia tuberculata, Rebutia arenacea, Rebutia fabrisii, Rebutia marsoneri, and Turbinicarpus pseudomacrochele ssp. krainzianus and was the main volatile of R.marsoneri and Gymnocalycium andreae flowers. In all DHG-producing plants studied, floral scents were emitted in a diurnal rhythm. "The emission rate studies of DHG in Rebutia fabrisii showed quantitative variation between individuals, despite the fact that these plants were maintained under identical conditions and the flowers were of the same developmental stage... The similarities of floral scent composition found in plants of different genera, as in some species of Gymnocalycium and Rebutia, give further indications that the odor bouquets of these cacti have no taxonomic value. Similar scent compositions more likely reflect convergent adaptations to the same pollinator groups..." \\
 [Musty‐Earthy Scent in Cactus Flowers: Characteristics of Floral Scent Production in Dehydrogeosmin‐Producing Cacti., Schlumpberger, B.O., Jux, A., Kunert, M., Boland, W., Wittmann, D., International Journal of Plant Sciences, 165(6), 2004, 1007-1015]