Benutzer-Werkzeuge

Webseiten-Werkzeuge


magnolia_grandiflora_l

Unterschiede

Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.

Link zu dieser Vergleichsansicht

Beide Seiten der vorigen RevisionVorhergehende Überarbeitung
Nächste Überarbeitung
Vorhergehende Überarbeitung
magnolia_grandiflora_l [2017/07/21 14:50] andreasmagnolia_grandiflora_l [2017/07/21 15:24] (aktuell) andreas
Zeile 8: Zeile 8:
 [Trapping, Investigation and Reconstitution of Flower Scents, Roman Kaiser, in: Müller, P.M., and Lamparsky, D. eds. Perfumes: Art, Science and Technology. Springer Science & Business Media, Dordrecht 1994, 213-250]   [Trapping, Investigation and Reconstitution of Flower Scents, Roman Kaiser, in: Müller, P.M., and Lamparsky, D. eds. Perfumes: Art, Science and Technology. Springer Science & Business Media, Dordrecht 1994, 213-250]  
  
-Main volatiles of the floral scent collted from M.grandiflora (dynamic headspace, Tenax TA) were geraniol (19.7%), (E)-β-ocimene (14.4%), β-myrcene (12.7%), limonene (9.9%), and verbenone (5.1%). \\+Main components of the floral scent collected from M.grandiflora (dynamic headspace, Tenax TA) were geraniol (19.7%), (E)-β-ocimene (14.4%), β-myrcene (12.7%), limonene (9.9%), verbenone (5.1%), and methyl dodecanoate (12.6%). Minor components were perillene (1.5%), linalool (0.6%), nerol (0.7%), neral (0.6%), sabinene/α-pinene (3.3%), terpinolene (2.1%), β-pinene (1.5%), α-terpineol (1.0%), isopinocamphone (1.0%), methyl hexanoate (1.6%), and methyl decanoate (3.7%) e.g.\\
 [Azuma, Hiroshi, et al. "Chemical divergence in floral scents of Magnolia and allied genera (Magnoliaceae)." Plant Species Biology 12.2‐3 (1997): 69-83]  [Azuma, Hiroshi, et al. "Chemical divergence in floral scents of Magnolia and allied genera (Magnoliaceae)." Plant Species Biology 12.2‐3 (1997): 69-83] 
  
magnolia_grandiflora_l.1500648602.txt.gz · Zuletzt geändert: 2017/07/21 14:50 von andreas

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki