Unterschiede

Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.

--- brugmansia_suaveolens_humb._bonpl._ex_willd._bercht._j.presl [2017/04/17 19:24]
andreas
+++ brugmansia_suaveolens_humb._bonpl._ex_willd._bercht._j.presl [2017/04/17 19:25]
andreas
@@ Zeile 6: / Zeile 6: @@
 [[http://www.missouribotanicalgarden.org/PlantFinder/PlantFinderDetails.aspx?kempercode=a491]]
-Main components of the flower scent (223µg/6h) were 1.8-cineole (25.5%), methyl benzoate (18.7%), geraniol (17.9%), and α-terpineol (10.6%). Minor components were benzaldehyde (1.8%), benzyl alcohol (1.4%), sabinene (1.6%), myrcene (6.1%), limonene (3.3%), (Z)-β-ocimene (0.1%), (E)-β-ocimene (0.7%), linalool (1.0%), citronellal (0.5%), neral (0.2%), geranial (1.1%), geranyl acetate (0.1%), citronellol (0.6%), nerol (0.3%), and nerolidol (3.8%). \\
+Main components of the collected flower scent (223µg/6h) were 1.8-cineole (25.5%), methyl benzoate (18.7%), geraniol (17.9%), and α-terpineol (10.6%). Minor components were benzaldehyde (1.8%), benzyl alcohol (1.4%), sabinene (1.6%), myrcene (6.1%), limonene (3.3%), (Z)-β-ocimene (0.1%), (E)-β-ocimene (0.7%), linalool (1.0%), citronellal (0.5%), neral (0.2%), geranial (1.1%), geranyl acetate (0.1%), citronellol (0.6%), nerol (0.3%), and nerolidol (3.8%). \\
 [Knudsen, Jette T., and Lars Tollsten. "Trends in floral scent chemistry in pollination syndromes: floral scent composition in moth‐pollinated taxa." Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 113.3 (1993): 263-284]

Tinkturenpresse